The directors putting their homes on the line deserve a Budget that backs them
<p>As compulsory liquidations rise 25% year on year, Purbeck is calling on the Chancellor to back the SME directors who guarantee their own business loans</p> <p>

Company insolvencies have fallen 5% since September last year, but the picture is more complex than that headline suggests. The number of compulsory liquidations is 25% higher than in September 2025. For many directors of these businesses, the debt does not end with the company. Lenders often ask SME owners to sign personal guarantees to secure finance, which can leave their homes and personal savings exposed if the business fails.
Todd Davison, Managing Director at Purbeck , says: “Small business owners are the people most likely to have signed a personal guarantee to keep their company funded. This Budget is a chance to recognise that risk and make it easier for them to borrow, grow and recover when things go wrong.”
The Growth Guarantee Scheme gives lenders a government-backed guarantee on part of a loan, but the borrower remains liable for the full amount. Purbeck is calling for greater transparency on how often directors are still asked for personal guarantees on scheme-backed lending, and clearer guidance so that business owners understand their exposure before they sign.
Personal guarantees for business lending sit largely outside consumer credit protections. Purbeck is calling for plain-English, government-backed guidance for directors on what a guarantee means, when it can be called in and how they can protect themselves.
HMRC’s Time to Pay arrangements are a lifeline for viable businesses with temporary cash flow problems. Purbeck would like the Budget to protect that flexibility, so that businesses facing a short-term squeeze are not pushed towards insolvency.
Purbeck supports calls to raise the small business rates relief threshold and the VAT registration threshold, and to avoid further increases in employment costs. Each would help SMEs keep more cash in the business, reducing the need to borrow and the personal risk that comes with it.
Many directors who lose a business go on to start again. Purbeck would welcome a capital gains tax relief that rewards entrepreneurs for reinvesting in a new UK business, and would like it to reflect the realities of founders rebuilding after a failure.
Todd Davison concludes: “When a business fails, the director with a personal guarantee can lose far more than their company. Most of the measures on our list cost little but would make a real difference to the people taking that risk. A Budget that backs SMEs needs to back the people who guarantee them, too.”
Written by
Todd Davison
Todd Davison writes on personal guarantee insurance and the risks taken by SME directors.
More from Finance

If growth is the goal, are policymakers listening to what business is saying?
<p>As the Chancellor prepares to deliver the Autumn Budget, CIMA's Building a Better Business report reveals a significant gap between the challenges policymakers focus on and those businesses actually face - and sets out what needs to change</p> <p>

UK SMEs are cautiously back. The Budget must not knock them off course
<p>Glenn Collins, Head of Technical and Strategic Engagement at ACCA UK, argues that SME confidence is recovering from a low base, and sets out three tests the Chancellor's Budget must pass to protect that fragile momentum</p> <p>

Are SMEs ready for the 60-day payment rule?
<p>Rupert Lee-Browne, CEO of Caxton, argues that the Commercial Payments Bill's 60-day payment rule is welcome news for SMEs - but only if they use the breathing space to overhaul their own payment processes first</p> <p>